My. SQL Wikipedia. My. SQL officially pronounced as My S Q L,6 is an open sourcerelational database management system RDBMS. Its name is a combination of My, the name of co founder Michael Wideniuss daughter,8 and SQL, the abbreviation for Structured Query Language. The My. SQL development project has made its source code available under the terms of the GNU General Public License, as well as under a variety of proprietary agreements. My. SQL was owned and sponsored by a single for profit firm, the Swedish company My. SQL AB, now owned by Oracle Corporation. For proprietary use, several paid editions are available, and offer additional functionality. My. SQL is a central component of the LAMP open source web application software stack and other AMP stacks. LAMP is an acronym for Linux, Apache, My. SQL, PerlPHPPython. Applications that use the My. SQL database include TYPO3, MODx, Joomla, Word. Press, php. BB, My. The real costs of SQL Server vs. Oracle. Microsoft and Oracle are engaged in a price war. Microsoft SQL Server struggles to grow up into the midsized database. In this tutorial, you will learn various ways to concatenate two or more strings into a single string using MySQL CONCAT and CONCATWS functions. Microsoft SQL Server is a SQLbased relational database management system designed for use in corporate applications, both on premises and in the cloud. BlogImages/images/asp-net-vs-php/asp-net-vs-php-performance-comparison-3.gif' alt='Mysql Vs Microsoft Sql Server' title='Mysql Vs Microsoft Sql Server' />BB, and Drupal. My. SQL is also used in many high profile, large scale websites, including Google1. Facebook,1. 21. Twitter,1. Flickr,1. Azure Database for MySQL is a fullymanaged database service for app developers. You will learn how to emulate the rownumber function in MySQL and how to add row number for each row or group of rows using MySQL rownumber. Useful free and paid utilities and tools for Microsoft SQL Server complete list of 213 Utilities. PostgreSQL vs. MS SQL Server. A comparison of two relational databases from the point of view of a data analyst. You. Tube. 1. 7OvervieweditMy. SQL is written in C and C. Its SQL parser is written in yacc, but it uses a home brewed lexical analyzer. My. SQL works on many system platforms, including AIX, BSDi, Free. BSD, HP UX, e. Com. Station, i. 5OS, IRIX, Linux, mac. OS, Microsoft Windows, Net. BSD, Novell Net. Ware, Open. BSD, Open. Solaris, OS2 Warp, QNX, Oracle Solaris, Symbian, Sun. OS, SCO Open. Server, SCO Unix. Mysql Vs Microsoft Sql Server' title='Mysql Vs Microsoft Sql Server' />Ware, Sanos and Tru. A port of My. SQL to Open. VMS also exists. 1. The My. SQL server software itself and the client libraries use dual licensing distribution. They are offered under GPL version 2,2. June 2. 00. 02. 1 which in 2. FLOSS License Exception2. Support can be obtained from the official manual. Free support additionally is available in different IRC channels and forums. Oracle offers paid support via its My. SQL Enterprise products. They differ in the scope of services and in price. Additionally, a number of third party organisations exist to provide support and services, including Maria. Mysql Vs Microsoft Sql Server' title='Mysql Vs Microsoft Sql Server' />DB and Percona. My. SQL has received positive reviews, and reviewers noticed it performs extremely well in the average case and that the developer interfaces are there, and the documentation not to mention feedback in the real world via Web sites and the like is very, very good. It has also been tested to be a fast, stable and true multi user, multi threaded sql database server. HistoryeditMy. SQL was created by a Swedish company, My. SQL AB, founded by David Axmark, Allan Larsson and Michael Monty Widenius. Original development of My. SQL by Widenius and Axmark began in 1. The first version of My. SQL appeared on 2. May 1. 99. 5. It was initially created for personal usage from m. SQL based on the low level language ISAM, which the creators considered too slow and inflexible. They created a new SQL interface, while keeping the same API as m. SQL. By keeping the API consistent with the m. SQL system, many developers were able to use My. SQL instead of the proprietarily licensed m. SQL antecedent. citation neededdubious discussMilestoneseditAdditional milestones in My. SQL development included First internal release on 2. May 1. 99. 5Version 3. End of 1. 99. 6, from www. Version 3. 2. 0 January 1. Windows version was released on 8 January 1. Windows 9. 5 and NTVersion 3. Version 3. 2. 2 alpha, beta from 1. Version 3. 2. 3 beta from June 2. January 2. 00. 12. Version 4. 0 beta from August 2. March 2. 00. 3 unions. Version 4. 0. 1 beta from August 2. Jyoticlarification neededcitation needed adopts My. SQL for database tracking. Version 4. 1 beta from June 2. October 2. 00. 4 R trees and B trees, subqueries, prepared statements. Version 5. 0 beta from March 2. October 2. 00. 5 cursors, stored procedures, triggers, views, XA transactions. The developer of the Federated Storage Engine states that The Federated Storage Engine is a proof of concept storage engine,2. My. SQL version 5. Documentation of some of the short comings appears in My. SQL Federated Tables The Missing Manual. Version 5. 1 contained 2. My. SQL 5. 1 and 6. CPU cores for processing a single query. Oracle acquired Sun Microsystems on 2. January 2. 01. 0. The day Oracle announced the purchase of Sun, Michael Monty Widenius forked My. SQL, launching Maria. DB, and took a swath of My. SQL developers with him. My. SQL Server 5. December 2. 01. 0update. Enhancements and features include. The default storage engine is Inno. DB, which supports transactions and referential integrity constraints. Improved Inno. DB IO subsystem3. Improved SMP support3. Semisynchronous replication. SIGNAL and RESIGNAL statement in compliance with the SQL standard. Support for supplementary Unicode character sets utf. New options for user defined partitioning. My. SQL Server 6. May 2. 00. 9 as the last release of the 6. Future My. SQL Server development uses a New Release Model. Features developed for 6. The general availability of My. SQL 5. 6 was announced in February 2. New features included performance improvements to the query optimizer, higher transactional throughput in Inno. DB, new No. SQL style memcached APIs, improvements to partitioning for querying and managing very large tables, TIMESTAMP column type that correctly stores milliseconds, improvements to replication, and better performance monitoring by expanding the data available through the PERFORMANCESCHEMA. The Inno. DB storage engine also included support for full text search and improved group commit performance. The general availability of My. SQL 5. 7 was announced in October 2. My. SQL Server 8. Milestone Release was announced 1. September 2. 01. 6. Release historyeditRelease. General availability. Latest minor version. Latest release. 5. Old version, no longer supported 2. Older version, yet still supported 2. Older version, yet still supported 2. Current stable version 2. NA8. 0. 3 rc4. 9Latest preview version of a future release 2. Legend Old version. Older version, still supported. Latest version. Latest preview version. Future release. Legal disputes and acquisitionseditOn 1. June 2. 00. 1, Nu. Sphere sued My. SQL AB, Tc. X Data. Konsult AB and its original authors Michael Monty Widenius and David Axmark in U. S District Court in Boston for breach of contract, tortious interference with third party contracts and relationships and unfair competition. In 2. 00. 2, My. SQL AB sued Progress Nu. Sphere for copyright and trademark infringement in United States district court. Nu. Sphere had allegedly violated My. SQLs copyright by linking My. SQLs GPLed code with Nu. Sphere Gemini table without being in compliance with the license. After a preliminary hearing before Judge Patti Saris on 2. February 2. 00. 2, the parties entered settlement talks and eventually settled. After the hearing, FSF commented that Judge Saris made clear that she sees the GNU GPL to be an enforceable and binding license. In October 2. 00. Oracle Corporation acquired Innobase OY, the Finnish company that developed the third party Inno. DB storage engine that allows My. SQL to provide such functionality as transactions and foreign keys. After the acquisition, an Oracle press release mentioned that the contracts that make the companys software available to My. SQL AB would be due for renewal and presumably renegotiation some time in 2. During the My. SQL Users Conference in April 2. Costs of SQL Server vs. Oracle. The real costs of SQL. Server vs. Oracle. Microsoft and Oracle are engaged in a price war. Microsoft SQL Server struggles to grow up into the midsized database. Oracle pushes down, to server the market for small. Also see As a result, we are flooded with marketing from both. There is some debate in the market about Oracle being too. Comparing SQL Server to Oracle is like comparing a. Maserati  Oracle is. SQL Server. There are also concerns about running productions. Microsoft Windows, one of the most notoriously unreliable OS. Oracles Technical Network forums have hundreds of reports of. Oracle failures due to being on a Windows platform. Here are the costs as of 2. OTN. Oracle vs. SQL Server licensing costs unverified cost figures. Here we see that while Oracle is at least 1. MS SQL, it. only costs 3x more than SQL server 2. Oracle 1. 1g Standard Edition Per Processor 1. Support 2. 2 3,8. Total Per Processor 2. Total 4 Processors 8. Oracle 1. 1g Standard Edition One Per Processor 5,8. Support 2. 2 1,2. Total Per. Processor 7,0. Total 2 Processors 1. SQL Server 2. 00. Standard Edition Per. Processor 5,9. Total 4 Processors 2. Cost Ratio Oracle SE to MSSQL SE 2. Oracle SEO to MSSQL SE 0. But the license costs are just a tiny fraction of the. Lets look at the total costs. Oracle and SQL Server. TCO of SQL. Server vs. Oracle. When evaluating priceperformance. Most shops look to. TCO total cost of ownership. TCO is a better measure because it factors in the cost of managing the. Oracles utilities are second to none, and Oracle was designed from the. DBA. When comparing the costs of Oracle vs. SQL Server we. must remember that its not just about features. SQL Server only runs on Intel, no HPUX, no Solaris, no. AIX, nothing industrial strength, with the exception of the UNISYS ES. Hence, SQL Server is not appropriate to take a customer. A. some point, the Intel based servers become overloaded and they must migrate. Oracle to enjoy the larger server environments. Oracle guru. Jeff Hunter, suggests that marketing studies are largely. Linux is far more powerful and stable than Windows I cant believe people are actually paid to come up with these. Lets see an apples to apples comparison. For example, put Oracle and MS SQL on the same hardware on Windows XP. Im going against my Never Windoze philosophy, but last I. MS SQL wasnt available on Linux. For a more complete discussion of the costs and. Oracle vs. SQL Server. Administration. cost of SQL Server vs. Oracle. The cost of a database is not limited to the sticker. Its like buying a horse, the purchase price is just a tiny. We have seen that the added features of Oracle make it. Oracle. This study clearly notes that Oracle is cheaper to operate, at a level. DBAs can perform typical administrative functions in 4. Oracle Database 1. Microsoft SQL. Server 2. Oracle Database 1. RDBMS tasks than Microsoft SQL Server 2. Best Cd Burner Software For Vista. Edisons metric for complexity assessment. Benefiting from increased DBA productivity due to lower. DBA by using Oracle Database 1. Microsoft SQL Server 2. This whitepaper shows specific examples of DBA tasks. Oracle. With the average DBAs salary at. DBA staffing costs by using Oracle over MSSQL. See my notes here on the. SQL Server and Oracle. Commentary. You get what you pay for, and, given that Oracle is the. I think its a real bargain at. My. company also supports. SQL server, and the amount of maintenance efforts for Oracle vs. SQL. Server are dramatically. Despite the hype, most shops I see are migrating from. SQL Server to Oracle. There are. Oracle from SQL server. Anytime I see comparisons of SQL Server and Oracle that smells of hyperbole in. I become concerned about credibility and possible bias. In marketing, claims of both Oracle and Microsoft should be. The quote below caught my eye because it reminded me of an. I saw last night that used exactly the same phrase Thats. One notable example of being penny wise and pound. DBMS like My. SQL, only to find that you. DBAs to keep it running. Worse yet, you risk lose millions of dollars in. The bottom line is that both. Oracle and SQL Server will work for small shops, but Oracle has a leg up. In the future, both SQL Server and Oracle will continue. SQL Server remains a Windows only solution, they. Oracles poor cousin.