Microsoft Sql Server 2005 Convert Date Time To String Format' title='Microsoft Sql Server 2005 Convert Date Time To String Format' />This topic discusses the breaking changes in SQL Server Native Client since SQL Server Native Client in SQL Server 2005. When you upgrade from Microsoft Data Access. I read dozens of blogs every day related to SQL Server and development. I decided to try and list the Microsoft blogs where I find the most valuable content. Plus I. My interest in writing this article was started by an MSDN article titled SQL Server 2005 The CLR Enters the Relational Stage. The article shows how to write a. Brent Ozar Unlimiteds specialized experts focus on your goals, diagnose your tough database pains, and make Microsoft SQL Server faster and more reliable. SQLines provides tools and services to help you transfer data, convert database schema DDL, views, stored procedures, functions, triggers, queries and SQL scripts. Adobe Photoshop Cs6 Keygen Download Kickass Torrents. Andy Baron. November 2006. Applies to Microsoft SQL Server 2005. Summary One way to create applications that use Microsoft Office Access for creating user. Using CROSS APPLY in SQL Server 2. First please take a second to read the MSDN article. Pay special attention to how much C code is required for the solution and how flexible it is. Note I also want to mention here that I started out trying to replicate their solution. I tried to install the MSI but that failed with an invalid characters message. I tried to recreate the CLR code but since he mostly posted snippets and had three versions I finally gave up trying to get that to work. One thing I really wanted to do was compare performance on identical data. Microsoft Sql Server 2005 Convert Date Time To String' title='Microsoft Sql Server 2005 Convert Date Time To String' />Unfortunately I wasnt able to do that. My example will use the Adventure. Works database. Lets start at the TOPAlong the way to making this solution work well discuss a few new features of SQL Server 2. The first is that the TOP clause can now take a variable DECLARE Rows INT. SELECT TOP Rows. What version of SQL Server do I have This unofficial build chart lists all of the known Service Packs SP, Cumulative Updates CU, patches, hotfixes and other. SQL Server articles, scripts, and discussion groups. FROM Sales. Sales. Order. Header. This will return the top 1. Sales. Order. Header. You can also replace Rows with anything that evaluates to a number. The following query looks odd but runs just fine SELECT TOP. M3Lmc.png' alt='Microsoft Sql Server 2005 Convert Date Time To String' title='Microsoft Sql Server 2005 Convert Date Time To String' />SELECT COUNT. FROM Sales. Customer. FROM Sales. Sales. Order. Header. There are 1. Customer table and this query returns the top 1. Sales. Order. Header. You can also use the TOP clause for INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE statements. Microsoft Sql Server 2005 Convert Date Time To String CIf you wanted to DELETE in batches of 5. TOP clause. My Function. Next we need a function to return the TOP X rows from Sales. Order. Header based on the total sales amount. That function looks like this CREATE FUNCTION dbo. Get. Top. Orderscustid AS int, n AS INT. RETURNS TABLE. SELECT TOPn FROM Sales. Sales. Order. Header. WHERE Customer. ID custid. ORDER BY Total. Due DESC. GONotice that it accepts the number of orders to return as a parameter. Also notice that Im using SELECT all over the place. I really encourage you to explicitly list out the columns when you write this for real. If you call this with a Customer. ID and a number of rows it will return that many rows ordered by the total amount of the order in descending order. Also notice that there is an ORDER BY clause in this function. Well talk about that in a minute. Apply the APPLY Clause. The real magic happens when you use SQL Server 2. APPLY clause. The APPLY clause lets you join a table to a table valued function. That lets you write a query like this SELECT C. Customer. ID. O. Sales. Order. ID. Adventure. Works. Sales. Customer AS C. Adventure. Works. Get. Top. OrdersC. Customer. ID, 3 AS O. Customer. ID ASC, Total. Due DESCwhich results in this. Customer. ID Sales. Order. ID Total. Due. The APPLY clause acts like a JOIN without the ON clause comes in two flavors CROSS and OUTER. The OUTER APPLY clause returns all the rows on the left side Customers whether they return any rows in the table valued function or not. The columns that the table valued function returns are null if no rows are returned. The CROSS APPLY only returns rows from the left side Customers if the table valued function returns rows. Notice that Im just passing in the Customer. ID to the function. It returns the TOP 3 rows based on the amount of the order. Since Im using CROSS APPLY a customer without orders wont appear in the list. I can also pass in a number other than 3 to easily return a different number of orders per customer. Even better I can pass in a different number of orders for each customer. So I could list the top 5 orders for one type of customer but the top 1. How cool is thatAnd it gets even better. Remember the function has an ORDER BY in it. It will always return the top orders based on the amount. However you can change the ORDER BY clause in the query that calls the function to display those rows in whatever order you want. You could easily display the top 3 orders in ascending order instead. Performance and Conclusion. Unfortunately I wasnt able to compare the performance of my solution to MSDNs. The query plan from my solution doesnt look that bad. And did I mention that it showed me a full query plan for the query with the UDF rather than just a UDF step Sweet If anyone gets their solution running send me the code and Ill update the article. I also think their solution returns the result as a comma separated value. Now that would be a great use for the CLR. You could easily wrap that around the results of this function for a fast, effecient procedure. And it happens to be the next article Im working on. If you want to see a great article on using the CLR inside SQL Server Id start with Using CLR Integration in SQL Server 2. The code is from an earlier beta but it gives you a great idea of when to use CLR code. In summary I think that 5 1. SQL is much simpler than 5. C or VB for this type of solution. The article provides a lot of good information on the CLR inside SQL Server. I just dont think this is the best place to use it. One of my biggest fears is that people will use the CLR incorrectly and cause performance problems. This is the first real case Ive seen of this. Is this really how Microsoft wants us to use the CLR UPDATEI was curious when I posted this how long it would take to find an even better solution. It didnt take long. Arnold Fribble posted it in the forums. The syntax needed a little tweaking but it appears you can do this in a single query. And how did I forget the PARTITION BY clause of the ROWNUMBER function. Doh Heres the cleaned up query. O. Customer. ID. O. Sales. Order. ID. ROWNUMBER ROWNUMBER OVER. PARTITION BY O. Customer. ID. ORDER BY O. Total. Due DESC. Sales. Sales. Order. Header AS O. ROWNUMBER lt 3. You have to use a derived table or a Common Table Expression since the row number function cant be used in the WHERE clause of the query where its defined. Now Ill have to write an article on the new ranking functions.